Saturday, January 31, 2026
Psychology Aisle
  • Home
  • Health
    • Brain Research
  • Mental Health
    • Alzheimers Disease
    • Bipolar Disorder
    • Cognition
    • Depression
  • Relationships
  • More
    • Mindfulness
    • Neuroscience
  • Latest Print Magazines
    • Psychology Aisle Summer 2024 Proposed
    • Psychology Aisle Spring 2024
    • Psychology Aisle January 2024
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Mental & Lifestyle Health
No Result
View All Result
Home Mental Health

Meta-analysis suggests income loss has greater impact on mental health than income gains

Editorial Team by Editorial Team
May 1, 2023
in Mental Health
Meta-analysis suggests income loss has greater impact on mental health than income gains
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


In new research published in The Lancet Public Health, researchers found that income loss at any level is associated with worsened mental health outcomes and an increase in income, especially out of poverty, is associated with better mental health outcomes.

Poor mental health has been linked with worsened physical and social outcomes. One’s income could be a major factor that impacts mental health. Research shows that low income is associated with poorer mental health outcomes, but it is unknown whether increases in one’s income improves mental health.

Low income and poor mental health share common causes, such as job loss, that may have a causal relationship with each other. Study author Rachel Thompson and her colleagues were interested in investigating how amounts of income loss and gain impact individuals’ mental health. The researchers conducted a meta-analysis and reviewed 136 studies regarding income changes and mental health outcomes, such as how income affects anxiety, depression, quality of life, and wellbeing.

A meta-analysis is a statistical technique used to combine and analyze data from multiple studies on a particular topic or research question. After identifying the relevant studies, the researcher extracts data on the study characteristics, sample size, and outcomes of interest. These data are then pooled together and analyzed using statistical methods to determine the overall effect size or magnitude of the relationship between the variables of interest.

Sixty-one percent of the studies reviewed contained reports of slight income changes and 30.1% contained reports of large income changes. Several income changes were related to taxes, healthcare, disasters, salary changes, and cash transfers.

Thompson and colleagues found that 88.9% of the studies showed that any amount of income loss was associated with poorer mental health outcomes and income increases were associated with improved mental health, regardless of the source of income loss or gain. Results also showed that mental health was affected more when income changes moved individuals across the poverty line.

Mental health outcomes from income loss were associated with two and a half times the magnitude of effect on mental health compared to income gains. In other words, individuals experienced a greater decline in mental health after income loss than individuals experiencing improved mental health after gaining income.

Thompson and colleagues argue that their findings suggest that financial loss has a greater negative impact on mental health than financial gain positively affects mental health. However, income increases is most effective in improving mental health when the increase resolves the individual from being in poverty.

“To be most supportive of population mental health and reduce inequalities, policy makers should design income and welfare policies that provide an adequate financial safety net for the most socioeconomically disadvantaged,” the researchers concluded. “There would be considerable value in future research investigating the mechanisms linking income and health, and the incorporation of these findings into intervention planning and evaluation.”

The study, “How do income changes impact on mental health and wellbeing for working-age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis“, was authored by Rachel M. Thomson, Erik Igelström, Amrit Kaur Purba, Michal Shimonovich, Hilary Thomson, Gerry McCartney, Aaron Reeves, Alastair Leyland, Anna Pearce, and S. Vittal Katikireddi.



Source link

Advertisement Banner
Previous Post

New Study Identifies 4 Key Profiles to Assess Self-Harm Risk in Children

Next Post

Itchy Eyes? How to Tell if it's the Arcturus COVID Strain or Allergies – Healthline

Next Post
Itchy Eyes? How to Tell if it's the Arcturus COVID Strain or Allergies – Healthline

Itchy Eyes? How to Tell if it's the Arcturus COVID Strain or Allergies - Healthline

Discussion about this post

Recommended

  • Peter H. Duesberg, 89, Renowned Biologist Turned H.I.V. Denialist, Dies – The New York Times
  • Navigating Perimenopause Together – How to Strengthen Your Relationship in Midlife
  • Stanford Study Reveals Colorblindness May Hide a Deadly Cancer Warning
  • A New CEO for Healthcare AI
  • Broken Up But Not Forgotten

© 2022 Psychology Aisle

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Health
    • Brain Research
  • Mental Health
    • Alzheimers Disease
    • Bipolar Disorder
    • Cognition
    • Depression
  • Relationships
  • More
    • Mindfulness
    • Neuroscience
  • Latest Print Magazines
    • Psychology Aisle Summer 2024 Proposed
    • Psychology Aisle Spring 2024
    • Psychology Aisle January 2024
  • Contact

© 2022 Psychology Aisle

×

Please fill the required fields*