
Mentalization is the flexibility to grasp the psychological states of oneself and others, thereby making sense of the intentions, behaviors, and emotional states that come about; it is a notably related ability within the therapeutic context.
A examine printed in Frontiers in Psychology examined whether or not (1) the mentalization capability of medical psychology college students differed from engineering college students’, and (2) whether or not this means differed between first and final yr psychology college students. The researchers reported no variations for the latter comparability, nevertheless, they discovered that psychology college students supplied greater self-reported scores of mentalization capability, in comparison with engineering college students.
“My interest in mentalization started when I began therapy training. I realized that the ability to mentalize was an important skill when trying to understand the patient, and to make the patient feel understood. I also discovered research that linked therapist mentalization skills to better outcomes in therapy,” stated Steffen André Fagerbakk, a psychologist/PhD-student on the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
The researchers recommend two potential influences on mentalization expertise in psychology college students. One chance is that present process medical coaching exposes college students to interpersonal conditions that promote mentalization (speculation 1). Alternatively, it could possibly be that people who’re already expert in mentalization usually tend to enter this area, and thus have good mentalization skills after they start their research (speculation 2).
A complete of 297 college students from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology participated on this analysis. This included college students enrolled within the first yr basic and medical psychology packages (which overlap in coaching), sixth yr medical psychology college students, and first and fifth yr engineering college students. Participants accomplished the mentalization scale, offering scores from 1 (fully disagree) to five (fully agree). Sample objects included “I am often confused about my exact feelings” and “People tell me that I understand them and give them sound advice.”
Fagerbakk and colleagues discovered no distinction in mentalization capability between first and final yr psychology college students. However, in comparison with engineering college students, first yr psychology college students had a higher capability for metallization, offering help for the second speculation. Further, girls had greater scores in comparison with males, and age was a optimistic predictor of members’ mentalization scores. These demographic results are in keeping with prior analysis on the subject.
“I think what’s most important about our study is that it indicates that psychologist education does not improve mentalization skills unless they are targeted specifically in therapy training. I believe that such therapist skills should be harvested through practice,” Fagerbakk advised PsyPost.
“We still need to learn more about how mentalization skills develops in students and therapists. Also, we need more studies on how mentalization can be trained as a skill,” he added. “Our study is cross-sectional, so it can’t really answer these questions. I think we need longitudinal studies on this subject in future research.”
The examine, “Does clinical training improve mentalization skills in future therapists? A comparison of first and last year students of clinical psychology and of engineering”, was authored by Steffen André Fagerbakk, Silje Helen Sørhøy, Torbjørn Nilsen and Nina Jakhelln Laugen.


Discussion about this post